In what way does social learning theory differ from behaviorism?

Social learning theory differs from behaviorism primarily in that it incorporates cognitive processes into the understanding of learning. This theory posits that individuals can learn not only through direct experience and reinforcement but also by observing the actions of others and the outcomes of those actions. This observational learning aspect underscores the importance of cognitive factors, such as attention, memory, and motivation, in the learning process.

In contrast, traditional behaviorism primarily emphasizes observable behaviors and external stimuli, neglecting the internal cognitive processes that can influence learning. Behaviorists focus on how behaviors are conditioned through reinforcement and punishment without considering how thoughts and motives play a role in the learning process.

The incorrect options highlight aspects of behaviorism that are inconsistent with the principles of social learning theory. Focusing strictly on observable behaviors, disregarding environmental influences, and emphasizing genetics over experience are all characteristics that align more closely with behaviorism and do not capture the broader view of learning that social learning theory offers.